In vitro biomechanics of divot use, and their placement, in orthodontic aligner therapy.

Autor: Kaur, Harsimrat, Khurelbaatar, Tsolmonbaatar, Mah, James, Heo, Giseon, Major, Paul W., Romanyk, Dan L.
Předmět:
Zdroj: Orthodontics & Craniofacial Research; Aug2024, Vol. 27 Issue 4, p527-534, 8p
Abstrakt: Introduction: To evaluate biomechanics of an aligner utilizing divots and the effect of their vertical placement on the right maxillary central incisor. Methods: An in vitro Orthodontic SIMulator (OSIM) was used to test forces and moments generated by aligners incorporating divots. The OSIM arch was scanned to generate a. STL version that was modified to create four models by placing divots on different positions of the right central maxillary incisor: GI – divots on gingival‐third of lingual surface and incisal‐third of labial surface; GM – divots on gingival‐third of lingual surface and middle‐third of labial surface; MI – divots on middle‐third of lingual surface and incisal‐third of labial surface; MM – divots on middle‐third of lingual surface and middle‐third of labial surface. Aligners (n = 30/model) were fabricated using a 0.75 mm thick polyethylene terephthalate material and Biostar® machine following the manufacturer's recommendations. A one‐way MANOVA followed by one‐way ANOVA (α = 0.05) was utilized to test effect of models on buccolingual force (Fy) and mesiodistal moment (Mx) at 0.20 mm of lingual displacement of the right maxillary central incisor. Results: Mean Mx for GI (−5.68 ± 7.38 Nmm), GM (3.75 ± 5.54 Nmm), MI (−4.27 ± 1.48 Nmm) and MM (1.96 ± 0.99 Nmm) models showed statistical differences between GI and GM, GI and MM, GM and MI and MI and MM. GI exerted the largest Fy (1.87 ± 0.75 N) followed by GM (1.10 ± 0.47 N), MI (0.70 ± 0.23 N) and MM (0.28 ± 0.08 N) with significant differences between GI and GM, GI and MI, GI and MM and GM and MM models. Conclusions: Vertical divot placement on a right central incisor had a significant effect on aligner biomechanics. Buccolingual forces exerted by models GI, GM and MI were within the range suggested by literature for bodily tooth movement without major root tipping for GM and MI models. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Databáze: Complementary Index