Autor: |
Raimann, Florian Jürgen, Neef, Vanessa, Hennighausen, Marie Charlotte, Zacharowski, Kai, Flinspach, Armin Niklas |
Předmět: |
|
Zdroj: |
Machine Learning & Knowledge Extraction; Jun2024, Vol. 6 Issue 2, p1145-1153, 9p |
Abstrakt: |
Introduction: Large language models (LLMs), such as ChatGPT, are a topic of major public interest, and their potential benefits and threats are a subject of discussion. The potential contribution of these models to health care is widely discussed. However, few studies to date have examined LLMs. For example, the potential use of LLMs in (individualized) informed consent remains unclear. Methods: We analyzed the performance of the LLMs ChatGPT 3.5, ChatGPT 4.0, and Gemini with regard to their ability to create an information sheet for six basic anesthesiologic procedures in response to corresponding questions. We performed multiple attempts to create forms for anesthesia and analyzed the results checklists based on existing standard sheets. Results: None of the LLMs tested were able to create a legally compliant information sheet for any basic anesthesiologic procedure. Overall, fewer than one-third of the risks, procedural descriptions, and preparations listed were covered by the LLMs. Conclusions: There are clear limitations of current LLMs in terms of practical application. Advantages in the generation of patient-adapted risk stratification within individual informed consent forms are not available at the moment, although the potential for further development is difficult to predict. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
Databáze: |
Complementary Index |
Externí odkaz: |
|