| Abstrakt: |
The article discusses the concept of the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) and its impact on international political discourse. While R2P has been hailed as revolutionary by some and criticized as a tool of Western imperialism by others, the author argues that it has had little effect on state behavior. Despite this, R2P has gained traction in international debates and has been supported by various organizations. However, the author contends that the support for R2P is largely symbolic and lacks consensus among governments. The article also examines specific cases, such as the violence against the Rohingya in Myanmar, to highlight the gap between affirmations of R2P and actual action taken. Overall, the author suggests that R2P is a superficial slogan rather than a meaningful concept. [Extracted from the article] |
