| Autor: |
Rooduijn, Matthijs, Pirro, Andrea L. P., Halikiopoulou, Daphne, Froio, Caterina, Van Kessel, Stijn, De Lange, Sarah L., Mudde, Cas, Taggart, Paul |
| Předmět: |
|
| Zdroj: |
British Journal of Political Science; Jul2024, Vol. 54 Issue 3, p969-978, 10p |
| Abstrakt: |
With a proliferation of scholarly work focusing on populist, far-left, and far-right parties, questions have arisen about the correct ways to ideologically classify such parties. To ensure transparency and uniformity in research, the discipline could benefit from a systematic procedure. In this letter, we discuss how we have employed the method of 'Expert-informed Qualitative Comparative Classification' (EiQCC) to construct the newest version of The PopuList (3.0) – a database of populist, far-left, and far-right parties in Europe since 1989. This method takes into account the in-depth knowledge of national party experts while allowing for systematic comparative analysis across cases and over time. We also examine how scholars have made use of the previous versions of the dataset, explain how the new version of The PopuList differs from previous ones, and compare it to other data. We conclude with a discussion of the strengths and limitations of The PopuList dataset. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
| Databáze: |
Complementary Index |
| Externí odkaz: |
|
