| Abstrakt: |
Introduced plants create lasting abiotic and biotic changes to soil that are increasingly implicated as major drivers of invasion success, yet models for investigating patterns in the impacts of these soil legacies are lacking. Here, we used Bohemian knotweed (Reynoutria × bohemica) to present a novel approach for testing whether accounting for diverse evolutionary drivers can clarify how an invader's soil legacy mediates its success. For most tested species, R. × bohemica's soil legacy did not influence seedling performance irrespective of its evolutionary history or the evolutionary novelty of species that share its soil. However, we found the relative importance of legacy effects versus other mechanisms of invader dominance depends on the life stage of the plants growing in soil conditioned by the invader. While the effects of R. × bohemica's soil legacy on seedling performance were context dependent, emergence was, on average, higher in R. × bohemica‐conditioned soils than in unconditioned soils. Thus, contrary to theory, R. × bohemica's soil legacy not only fails to impede potential competitors but may also facilitate them. Our results are particularly powerful: we detected novel insights in the face of biological complexity, even for R. × bohemica, which likely does not depend on heterospecific plant–soil feedbacks for its competitive dominance in its introduced range. Designing rigorous investigations that explore how plant species' evolutionary histories mediate an invader's soil legacy across diverse abiotic environments, as shown here, is key for producing insights in other systems. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
Plný text