| Abstrakt: |
In life sciences, random forests are often used to train predictive models. However, gaining any explanatory insight into the mechanics leading to a specific outcome is rather complex, which impedes the implementation of random forests into clinical practice. By simplifying a complex ensemble of decision trees to a single most representative tree, it is assumed to be possible to observe common tree structures, the importance of specific features and variable interactions. Thus, representative trees could also help to understand interactions between genetic variants. Intuitively, representative trees are those with the minimal distance to all other trees, which requires a proper definition of the distance between two trees. Thus, we developed a new tree-based distance measure, which incorporates more of the underlying tree structure than other metrics. We compared our new method with the existing metrics in an extensive simulation study and applied it to predict the age at onset based on a set of genetic risk factors in a clinical data set. In our simulation study we were able to show the advantages of our weighted splitting variable approach. Our real data application revealed that representative trees are not only able to replicate the results from a recent genome-wide association study, but also can give additional explanations of the genetic mechanisms. Finally, we implemented all compared distance measures in R and made them publicly available in the R package timbR (https://github.com/imbs-hl/timbR). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
Full text from SpringerLink