| Autor: |
Wubshet, Ashenafi Kiros, Werid, Gebremeskel Mamu, Teklue, Teshale, Luoyi Zhou, Bayasgalan, Chimedtseren, Tserendorj, Ariunaa, Jinjin Liu, Heath, Livio, Yuefeng Sun, Yaozhong Ding, Wenxiu Wang, Zaberezhny, Alexei D., Yongsheng Liu, Jie Zhang |
| Předmět: |
|
| Zdroj: |
Frontiers in Veterinary Science; 2024, p1-10, 10p |
| Abstrakt: |
Background: Several factors, such as diverse serotypes, vaccination methods, weak biosecurity, and animal movements, contribute to recurrent Foot-and-Mouth Disease Virus (FMDV) outbreaks in Africa, establishing endemicity. These outbreaks cost over $2 billion annually, prompting a high-priority focus on FMDV vaccination. Despite extensive efforts, vaccine efficacy varies. This study aims to evaluate routine foot and mouth disease (FMD) vaccines in Africa via systematic review and meta-analysis. Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis were carried out following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Meta-analysis was conducted to assess the efficacy of FMDV vaccination using the meta for package of R. Results: Vaccinated animals have roughly a 69.3% lower chance of FMDV infection compared to unvaccinated animals, as indicated by the pooled results from the random-effects model, which showed a risk ratio (RR) of 0.3073. There was a statistically significant heterogeneity (p < 0.05) across all of the included articles. Conclusion: Overall findings suggest that if properly planned and implemented, FMDV vaccination programs and strategies in Africa could help control the spread of the disease throughout the continent and beyond. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
| Databáze: |
Complementary Index |
| Externí odkaz: |
|
