| Autor: |
Rosyadi, Erlan, Zuldian, Prima, Rahmawati, Nurdiah, Pertiwi, Astri, Rini, Tyas Puspita, Hidayat, Ali Nurdin, Rusmana, Ardian Salsa, Yamin, M. Arief, Permana, Edwin |
| Předmět: |
|
| Zdroj: |
AIP Conference Proceedings; 2024, Vol. 3074 Issue 1, p1-9, 9p |
| Abstrakt: |
Biomass gasification technology is currently being actively developed because this process can produce a syngas which is valuable in the energy and chemical industries. Syngas was the raw material of several products such as methane, methanol, DME, and Fischer-Tropsch fuel. In producing syngas, the appropriate technology is needed to get syngas whose contents meet the requirements for downstream processing. In this research, syngas production has been carried out using bubbling fluidized bed gasification technology. By using downdraft technology, the operating temperature is around 800-1200°C, while with bubbling fluidized bed technology the operating temperature is around 700°C and the bed material used is bentonite. Feeding of OPEFB is carried out in two different conditions that are encapsulated and non-encapsulated biomass. As for the result, the composition of gas products of non-encapsulated biomass and encapsulated biomass was relatively the same with around 22% of H2 and 40% CO. However non encapsulated biomass shows slightly higher performance compared to encapsulated biomass, it can be seen from higher H2/CO ratio (0,77 for non-encapsulated and 0,74 for encapsulated biomass) and CO composition (43% for non-encapsulated and 38% for encapsulated biomass. In addition, the resulting product showed that the syngas composition produced by downdraft technology was more stable than the syngas composition produced by bubbling fluidized bed technology. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
| Databáze: |
Complementary Index |
| Externí odkaz: |
|
