Autor: |
Shiode, Ryoya, Miyamura, Satoshi, Kazui, Arisa, Iwahashi, Toru, Tanaka, Hiroyuki, Okada, Seiji, Murase, Tsuyoshi, Oka, Kunihiro |
Předmět: |
|
Zdroj: |
Journal of Orthopaedic Research; Jul2024, Vol. 42 Issue 7, p1509-1518, 10p |
Abstrakt: |
This study aimed to investigate deformity patterns that cause clinical impairments and determine the acceptable range of deformity in the treatment of forearm diaphyseal fractures. A three‐dimensional (3D) deformity analysis based on computed bone models was performed on 39 patients with malunited diaphyseal both‐bone forearm fractures to investigate the 3D deformity patterns of the radius and ulna at the fracture location and the relationship between 3D deformity and clinical impairments. Clinical impairments were evaluated using forearm motion deficit. Cutoff values of forearm deformities were calculated by performing receiver operating characteristic analysis using the deformity angle and the limited forearm rotation range of motion (less than 50° of pronation or supination) resulting in activities of daily living (ADL) impairment as variables. The extension, varus, and pronation deformities most commonly occurred in the radius, whereas the extension deformity was commonly observed in the ulna. A positive correlation was observed between pronation deficit and extension deformity of the radius (R = 0.41) and between supination deficit and pronation deformity of the ulna (R = 0.44). In contrast, a negative correlation was observed between pronation deficit and pronation deformity of the radius (R = −0.44) and between pronation deficit and pronation deformity of the ulna (R = −0.51). To minimize ADL impairment, radial extension deformity should be <18.4°, radial rotation deformity <12.8°, and ulnar rotation deformity <16.6°. The deformities in the sagittal and axial planes of the radius and in the axial plane of the ulna were responsible for the limited forearm rotation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
Databáze: |
Complementary Index |
Externí odkaz: |
|