| Autor: |
Takagi, Fugen, Furuse, Motomasa, Kuwabara, Hiroko, Kambara, Akihiro, Omura, Naoki, Tanabe, Shogo, Yagi, Ryokichi, Hiramatsu, Ryo, Kameda, Masahiro, Nonoguchi, Naosuke, Kawabata, Shinji, Takami, Toshihiro, Miyatake, Shin‐Ichi, Wanibuchi, Masahiko |
| Zdroj: |
Neuropathology; Jun2024, Vol. 44 Issue 3, p240-246, 7p |
| Abstrakt: |
We report the case of a 70‐year‐old woman with metastatic brain tumors who underwent surgical removal of the tumor and radiation necrosis. The patient had a history of colon cancer and had undergone surgical removal of a left occipital tumor. Histopathological evaluation revealed a metastatic brain tumor. The tumor recurred six months after surgical removal, followed by whole‐brain radiotherapy, and the patient underwent stereotactic radiosurgery. Six months later, the perifocal edema had increased, and the patient became symptomatic. The diagnosis was radiation necrosis and corticosteroids were initially effective. However, radiation necrosis became uncontrollable, and the patient underwent removal of necrotic tissue two years after stereotactic radiosurgery. Pathological findings predominantly showed necrotic tissue with some tumor cells. Since the vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and hypoxia‐inducible factor‐1α (HIF‐1α) were expressed around the necrotic tissue, the main cause of the edema was determined as radiation necrosis. Differences in the expression levels and distribution of HIF‐1α and VEGF were observed between treatment‐naïve and recurrent tumor tissue and radiation necrosis. This difference suggests the possibility of different mechanisms for edema formation due to the tumor itself and radiation necrosis. Although distinguishing radiation necrosis from recurrent tumors using MRI remains challenging, the pathophysiological mechanism of perifocal edema might be crucial for differentiating radiation necrosis from recurrent tumors. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
| Databáze: |
Complementary Index |
| Externí odkaz: |
|
Plný text