| Autor: |
MCGINNIS-WELSH, DANIEL A. |
| Předmět: |
|
| Zdroj: |
Journal of Indo-Pacific Affairs; May/Jun2024, Vol. 7 Issue 3, p188-205, 18p |
| Abstrakt: |
This article evaluates the theory of nuclear superiority-brinkmanship proposed by Matthew Kroenig, highlighting its fatal flaws through historical evidence and strategic analysis. It emphasizes the risks of reigniting an unsustainable arms race due to the US legacy of pursuing technological developments without a cohesive strategy, known as "bootstrapping." Assessing the impracticality of limited nuclear war and the importance of secure second-strike capabilities, it advocates for a modern US nuclear deterrent based on a balanced force of advanced nuclear systems, complemented by robust conventional capabilities and infrastructure. Prioritizing credible deterrence over compellence aligns with national interests and reduces the risk of unintentional nuclear conflict. Pursuing Kroenig's flawed theory, given its high costs and potential catastrophic consequences, is deemed unwise for guiding US nuclear strategy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
| Databáze: |
Complementary Index |
| Externí odkaz: |
|
