Home‐Based Telemedicine in Rheumatology—A Scoping Review.

Autor:	Venuturupalli, Swamy, Peck, Alexander, Jinka, Yogamanas, Fortune, Natalie, Davuluri, Nikhil, Nowell, William B., Gavigan, Kelly, Cush, John, Soares, Neelkamal, Grainger, Rebecca, Curtis, Jeffrey R.
Předmět:	HOME care services HEALTH services accessibility INTERNET access PHYSICAL diagnosis PREDICTION models RESEARCH funding SYSTEMIC lupus erythematosus AGE distribution EVALUATION of medical care TELEMEDICINE SYSTEMATIC reviews MEDLINE LITERATURE reviews MEDICAL databases MEDICAL appointments ARTHRITIS TECHNOLOGY RHEUMATOLOGY ONLINE information services INFLAMMATION PATIENT satisfaction HEALTH outcome assessment MEDICAL practice MEDICAL triage PATIENT aftercare
Zdroj:	ACR Open Rheumatology; May2024, Vol. 6 Issue 5, p312-320, 9p
Abstrakt:	Objective: We performed a scoping review of the relevant literature on home‐based telehealth in rheumatology to understand its appropriate application in rheumatology practice. Methods: We searched the Cochrane Library, PubMed, Web of Science, and scientific meeting abstracts to identify articles that specifically addressed telehealth suitability, barriers to telehealth, patient‐reported outcomes (PROs) collected in telehealth settings, and telehealth satisfaction. From the initial search of 4,882 studies, 23 reports were included. In addition, 10 abstracts were also eligible for analysis, resulting in a total of 33 articles: 2 randomized clinical trials, 9 prospective cohort studies, and 22 retrospective studies. Results: We found that triage appointments or predictive models could be helpful in selecting patients for telehealth and that telehealth interventions were appropriate for follow‐up of patients with systemic lupus erythematosus and inflammatory arthritis, but that conducting new patient visits over telehealth was not ideal. Barriers to telehealth include patient factors (age, technology access) and need for physician/process factors (eg, physical examinations). PROs collected in regular practice can be incorporated into telehealth. Several small, single‐center studies suggest that telehealth does not lead to negative outcomes compared with in‐person visits, and overall, patients report high patient satisfaction with telehealth. In several scenarios, home‐based telehealth was equivalent to in‐person visits with regard to patient outcomes and satisfaction. Conclusion: The widespread potential of telehealth to manage and deliver care for people with rheumatic disease is significant. As such, further research in the form of randomized controlled trials can help contribute to growing evidence that shapes telehealth implementation for patients with rheumatic diseases. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Databáze:	Complementary Index
Externí odkaz:	Zobrazit plný text záznamu Plný text