Autor: |
Anggriant, Vincent, Sianturi, Dahlan, Saragih, Rajin S., Sibarani, Parbarita, Purba, Johnliberti, Margareth, S. L., Gultom |
Předmět: |
|
Zdroj: |
International Journal of Social Health; Mar2024, Vol. 3 Issue 3, p231-244, 14p |
Abstrakt: |
This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of single-stage and twostage urethroplasty procedures in hypospadias repair. Researchers conducted a systematic review of relevant literature using medical databases and manual searches of relevant articles. We assessed the outcomes of clinical studies related to single-stage and two-stage urethroplasty techniques, as well as identifying the advantages and disadvantages of each. Our review findings indicate that single-stage urethroplasty offers advantages in terms of shorter hospital stays and increased comfort for both patients and medical staff. However, twostage urethroplasty has advantages in more aggressive chordee correction and lower recurrence rates. Nevertheless, there is no one-size-fits-all approach to hypospadias repair, as the choice of urethroplasty technique often depends on the preferences and specific expertise of individual surgeons. This research highlights the importance of selecting the appropriate urethroplasty technique based on patient characteristics and surgeon expertise. Future research needs to expand our knowledge of factors influencing the success of urethroplasty procedures to guide better clinical decision-making in hypospadias management. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
Databáze: |
Complementary Index |
Externí odkaz: |
|