Abstrakt: |
The supervision rupture literature has emphasized supervisor rupturing behavior and reparative actions. But supervisees engage in rupturing actions, too. How might their rupturing behavior impact the supervisor/supervisory relationship? And what do supervisors do about supervisee ruptures in order to move forward? I subsequently (re)consider the rupture literature, recognizing supervisee ruptures as a minimally considered supervision reality, foregrounding the supervisee as a potential rupturing party, and providing supervisee rupture examples. I examine how supervisee ruptures can evoke supervisor confrontation and withdrawal rupture reactions and identify supervisor rupture-resolution strategies that can serve as relational corrective. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |