| Autor: |
Robles-Medranda, C., Baquerizo-Burgos, J., Puga-Tejada, M., Alcivar-Vasquez, J., Del Valle, R., Alvarado-Escobar, H., Egas-Izquierdo, M., Cunto, D., Arevalo-Mora, M., Pitanga-Lukashok, H. |
| Předmět: |
|
| Zdroj: |
Endoscopy; 2024 Supplement 2, Vol. 56, pS472-S472, 1p |
| Abstrakt: |
This article, published in the journal Endoscopy, examines the impact of cholangioscope diameter variation on cholangioscopy outcomes. The study compares the success rates of diagnostic and therapeutic procedures using cholangioscopes of different diameters. The results show that the 9.3F cholangioscope is more suitable for diagnostic procedures and has a higher technical success rate, while the 11.1F cholangioscope is preferable for therapeutic interventions, especially for larger biliary stones. The study also suggests that the 7F cholangioscope can be an effective alternative for evaluating intrahepatic ducts. [Extracted from the article] |
| Databáze: |
Complementary Index |
| Externí odkaz: |
|
