| Autor: |
Gierzynski, Theresa F., Gregoire, Allyson, Reader, Jonathan M., Pantis, Rebecca, Campbell, Stephen, Bhaumik, Arijit, Rahman-Filipiak, Annalise, Heidebrink, Judith, Giordani, Bruno, Paulson, Henry, Hampstead, Benjamin M. |
| Předmět: |
|
| Zdroj: |
Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society; Feb2024, Vol. 30 Issue 2, p183-193, 11p |
| Abstrakt: |
Objective: Few studies have evaluated in-home teleneuropsychological (teleNP) assessment and none, to our knowledge, has evaluated the National Alzheimer's Coordinating Center's (NACC) Uniform Data Set version 3 tele-adapted test battery (UDS v3.0 t-cog). The current study evaluates the reliability of the in-home UDS v3.0 t-cog with a prior in-person UDS v3.0 evaluation. Method: One hundred and eighty-one cognitively unimpaired or cognitively impaired participants from a longitudinal study of memory and aging completed an in-person UDS v3.0 and a subsequent UDS v3.0 t-cog evaluation (∼16 months apart) administered either via video conference (n = 122) or telephone (n = 59). Results: We calculated intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) between each time point for the entire sample. ICCs ranged widely (0.01–0.79) but were generally indicative of "moderate" (i.e., ICCs ranging from 0.5–0.75) to "good" (i.e., ICCs ranging from 0.75–0.90) agreement. Comparable ICCs were evident when looking only at those with stable diagnoses. However, relatively stronger ICCs (Range: 0.35–0.87) were found between similarly timed in-person UDS v3.0 evaluations. Conclusions: Our findings suggest that most tests on the UDS v3.0 t-cog battery may serve as a viable alternative to its in-person counterpart, though reliability may be attenuated relative to the traditional in-person format. More tightly controlled studies are needed to better establish the reliability of these measures. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
| Databáze: |
Complementary Index |
| Externí odkaz: |
|
