| Autor: |
Chand, Prangya Lochan, Das, Soubhagya Kumar, Behera, Rupashree, Mahapatra, Abani Kumar |
| Předmět: |
|
| Zdroj: |
Journal of Cardiovascular Disease Research (Journal of Cardiovascular Disease Research); 2024, Vol. 15 Issue 1, p2702-2709, 8p |
| Abstrakt: |
Background: The appropriate time of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in treating acute cholecystitis is still debated. There are two techniques to treating acute cholecystitis: early cholecystectomy, which is done within 72 hours after the commencement of the condition. Delayed or interval cholecystectomy is conducted 6 to 8 weeks after the first medical therapy with antimicrobial medicines. Aim of the Study: The study's goal is to compare early versus delayed or interval cholecystectomy in patients with acute calculous cholecystitis. Methodology: Patients with acute cholecystitis admitted to the General Surgery department at SRM Medical college and Hospital, Kalahandi were separated into two groups. Patients in group A have an early laparoscopic cholecystectomy, whereas patients in group B who arrive after 72 hours will have a delayed or interval cholecystectomy. Conclusion: There is no significant difference in overall clinical outcomes between individuals treated with early and delayed cholecystectomy for acute calculous cholecystitis. The delayed cholecystectomy group had a longer total hospital stay and requires more medication than the early cholecystectomy group. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
| Databáze: |
Complementary Index |
| Externí odkaz: |
|
