| Abstrakt: |
The Minister of Education and Science recently made changes to the list of scientific journals and conference materials, prompting the author to reflect on the impact of high point values and the lack of transparency in the evaluation process. While higher point values may increase prestige, the author argues that it can also lead to arrogance and discouragement for authors. They call for a more transparent evaluation process and emphasize the importance of constructive criticism for authors' improvement. The article also covers various legal and administrative topics, providing different perspectives and analyzing the legal implications of issues such as individual rights, local government terms, marriage from a public law perspective, environmental impact reports, and the protection of personal rights for unborn children. This text offers valuable insights for readers interested in law and administration. [Extracted from the article] |
