| Autor: |
Kumar, B. R. Saikishore, Ega, Jagadeesh Kumar, Sanikommu, Suma |
| Předmět: |
|
| Zdroj: |
Journal of Advanced Zoology; 2024, Vol. 45 Issue 1, p818-824, 7p |
| Abstrakt: |
The one step combination of an objective particle in a similar response vessel is generally viewed as an effective methodology in manufactured natural science. Several one step synthesis of biologically active molecules, primarily employing organo catalytic methods, is discussed in this overview, along with their strengths and weaknesses. The one step economy ideas presented here are not only applicable to catalysis but also to organometallic and organic reaction techniques in general. A synthesis that requires multiple steps could instead be carried out in a single reaction flask with a one step synthesis. Envision that a union including numerous means expects that you stir up the response at each step, then decontaminate and carry on the material to the following stage. During workup and/or purification, you will, of course, lose some materials regardless of how cautiously you move chemicals from flask to flask. As a result, I believe that the fact that it is less likely to lose material during workup and purification is the most significant advantage. The use of chemicals and solvents is cost-effective, which is the second benefit. If the reaction needs to be worked up at each step, you will almost always need to use solvents that will eventually go to waste. Multiple-step one-flask synthesis would only require final workup at the final step. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
| Databáze: |
Complementary Index |
| Externí odkaz: |
|
