| Autor: |
Micheli, Leonardo, Smestad, Greg P., Khan, Muhammad Zahid, Lange, Katja, Almughary, Huda M. I., Abraim, Mounir, Alamat, Yanal, Anderson, Cody B., Bentouba, Said, Figgis, Benjamin, Fuke, Pavan, Hachicha, Ahmed Amine, Karim, Mounia, Kottantharayil, Anil, Martinez-Morales, Alfredo A., Alami Merrouni, Ahmed, Olivares, Douglas, Picotti, Giovanni, Rabanal-Arabach, Jorge, Wiesinger, Florian |
| Předmět: |
|
| Zdroj: |
Solar RRL; Feb2024, Vol. 8 Issue 3, p1-14, 14p |
| Abstrakt: |
The use of image analysis has often been suggested as a practical way to monitor the soiling accumulated on the surfaces of solar energy conversion devices. Indeed, the deposited soiling particles can be counted and characterized to calculate the area they cover, and this area can be converted into an energy loss. However, several particle counting methodologies exist and can lead to dissimilar results. This work focuses on the role of thresholding, an essential step where particles are distinguished from a background based on the pixel brightness. Sixteen automatic thresholding methods are assessed using 13 200 micrographs of glass coupons soiled at nine locations globally. In low‐to‐intermediate soiling conditions, the "Triangle" method is found to return the minimum coefficient of variation and a mean deviation closer to zero. On the other hand, methods assuming a bimodal distribution of pixel brightness underestimate the area coverage. In addition, since soiling can be unevenly distributed over a surface, different loss estimations can be returned when the same image analysis process is used on different spots on a sample's surface. For these reasons, image analysis should be repeated at multiple locations on each investigated surface. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
| Databáze: |
Complementary Index |
| Externí odkaz: |
|
Plný text