| Autor: |
Wang, Ya-Ting, Wang, Xiao-Le, Lei, Lan, Guo, Zhen-Yu, Kan, Fei-Fei, Hu, Die, Gai, Cong, Zhang, Yi |
| Předmět: |
|
| Zdroj: |
European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology; Feb2024, Vol. 80 Issue 2, p287-296, 10p |
| Abstrakt: |
Purpose: To systematically assess the evidence of efficacy and safety of the use of ketamine and esketamine for patients with treatment-resistant depression (TRD) with suicidal ideation (SI). Methods: We independently searched for clinical trials from inception to January 2023 using electronic databases, e.g., PubMed and EMBASE. A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed to assess SI scores of depression rating scales, which were regarded as the outcomes. Results: A total of five independent double-blind, placebo controlled randomized clinical trials (RCTs) are eligible for inclusion. Four of the studies used ketamine as an intervention and one used esketamine as an intervention. Three hundred ninety-one patients with TRD were included (the intervention group with ketamine or esketamine is 246, and the control group is 145). No statistically significant interaction between the subscales of suicide ideation (SMD = − 0.66, 95% CI (− 1.61, 0.29); Z = 1.36, P = 0.17) and antidepressant effects (SMD = − 0.99, 95% CI (− 2.33, 0.34); Z = 1.46, P = 0.15) based on the results of ketamine and esketamine, compared with placebo groups. Conclusion: This meta-analysis suggested that esketamine and ketamine have failed to reduce suicidal ideation in patients with TRD. Further studies are desirable to confirm the effects of ketamine and esketamine in TRD patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
| Databáze: |
Complementary Index |
| Externí odkaz: |
|
Full text from SpringerLink