Does the Position of the Ankle Matter During the Single Gluteal Bridge in Futsal Players? An Electromyographic Analysis.
| Autor: | Elias, Gonzalo, Jerez-Mayorga, Daniel, Intelangelo, Leonardo |
|---|---|
| Předmět: |
HAMSTRING muscle physiology
LEG physiology ANKLE physiology CALF muscle physiology ANKLE CROSS-sectional method SOCCER DATA analysis REHABILITATION STATISTICAL sampling MANN Whitney U Test MUSCLE strength testing DESCRIPTIVE statistics ATHLETES BUTTOCKS ELECTROMYOGRAPHY MUSCLE strength STATISTICS RESEARCH ATHLETIC ability DATA analysis software RANGE of motion of joints MUSCLE contraction |
| Zdroj: | Journal of Sport Rehabilitation; Feb2024, Vol. 33 Issue 2, p73-78, 6p |
| Abstrakt: | Context: The aim of this study was to analyze the muscle activity of the hamstring muscles and the lateral gastrocnemius during different variants of the single-leg bridge (SLB) in futsal players. Design: Cross-sectional study. Methods: Twenty-two futsal players (age = 24.8 [3.9] y) volunteered to participate in this study. The participants performed 3 variations of the SLB with the knee flexed at 45°. The first position was performed with the ankle in plantar position with flat support, the second with the ankle in dorsiflexion (DF) with heel support, and the third with the ankle in DF and external rotation (ER) with heel support. The Wilcoxon rank-sum test assessed the difference between variables for samples with the rank-biserial correlation effect size. Spearman correlation coefficients were used to examine the associations of the percentage maximal voluntary isometric contraction for each muscle with peak force and rate of force development with 3 different variances of the SLB. Results: The variation of ankle DF and ER with heel support generated higher muscle activity in BF in concentric (P<.01, effect size [ES] = -0.613); isometric (P<.042, ES = -0.494); and eccentric (P<.005, ES = -0.668) contraction than ankle DF with heel support. In contrast, the variation of ankle DF and ER with heel support generated fewer muscle activity in lateral gastrocnemius in concentric (P < .001, ES = 0.779); isometric (P < .003, ES = 0.708); and eccentric (P < .014, ES = 0.589) contraction than ankle DF with heel support. Conclusions: The position of DF and ER was the best position in SLB to train the BF. It could be convenient to start rehabilitation of the BF with flat foot postition or ankle in DF with heel support and progress with the position of the ankle in DF and ER with heel support. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
| Databáze: | Complementary Index |
| Externí odkaz: |
|