| Autor: |
Boyd, Nora Mills, Matthiessen, Dana |
| Předmět: |
|
| Zdroj: |
Philosophy of Science; Jan2024, Vol. 91 Issue 1, p111-131, 21p |
| Abstrakt: |
This article argues against general claims for the epistemic superiority of experiment over observation. It does so by dissociating the benefits traditionally attributed to experiment from physical manipulation. In place of manipulation, we argue that other features of research methods do confer epistemic advantages in comparison to methods in which they are diminished. These features better track the epistemic successes and failures of scientific research, crosscut the observation/experiment distinction, and nevertheless explain why manipulative experiments are successful when they are. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
| Databáze: |
Complementary Index |
| Externí odkaz: |
|
