| Abstrakt: |
Objective: Laboratory accreditation has been shown to impact variability and completeness. However, little data exist demonstrating the impact of personnel credentialing on completeness and efficiency. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate exam completeness and efficiency among staff with an advanced cardiac sonographer (ACS) credential, Registered Diagnostic Cardiac Sonographer or Registered Cardiac Sonographer and noncredentialed staff. Materials and Methods: Retrospective review of adult and pediatric echocardiograms at eight facilities in three states. Exam completeness was compared with Intersocietal Accreditation Commission (IAC) standards and completeness by pathology was compared with the American Society of Echocardiography (ASE) standards. Results: This study was based on the review of 1147 patient cases. Of the cases reviewed, 60.3% were performed by credentialed (non-ACS) sonographers, 28.3% were completed by credentialed ACS, and 11.3% by noncredentialed staff. The credentialed staff completed exams ≤ 12 hours. The exams were reviewed for compliance with IAC standards and completed by ACS staff: 80.0% in aortic stenosis and 55.6% in non-ACS staff. Those patient cases for mitral regurgitation (14/19) were 73.7% IAC compliant, cases completed by credentialed non-ACS (20/56) were 35.7% compliant, and those completed by noncredentialed sonographers (2/11) only 18.2% were compliant. Cases specific to patent ductus arteriosus were 92.1% compliant with IAC standards that were completed by ACS compared with 77.9% completed by non-ACS staff. Cases of pulmonary hypertension were also evaluated for IAC compliance and 61.8% met the standard with ASE versus 41.7% completed by non-ACS. Conclusion: Examinations performed by ACS are more often complete in important pathology. Examination efficiency is highest among credentialed sonographers. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
