Quantitative computed tomography has higher sensitivity detecting critical bone mineral density compared to dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in postmenopausal women and elderly men with osteoporotic fractures: a real-life study.

Autor: Boehm, Elena, Kraft, Eduard, Biebl, Johanna Theresia, Wegener, Bernd, Stahl, Robert, Feist-Pagenstert, Isa
Předmět:
Zdroj: Archives of Orthopaedic & Trauma Surgery; Jan2024, Vol. 144 Issue 1, p179-188, 10p
Abstrakt: Introduction: Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) is considered the gold standard for the diagnosis of osteoporosis and assessment of fracture risk despite proven limitations. Quantitative computed tomography (QCT) is regarded as a sensitive method for diagnosis and follow-up. Pathologic fractures are classified as the main clinical manifestation of osteoporosis. The objective of the study was to compare DXA and QCT to determine their sensitivity and discriminatory power. Materials and methods: Patients aged 50 years and older were included who had DXA of the lumbar spine and femur and additional QCT of the lumbar spine within 365 days. Fractures and bone mineral density (BMD) were retrospectively examined. BMD measurements were analyzed for the detection of osteoporotic fractures. Sensitivity and receiver operating characteristic curve were used for calculations. As an indication for a second radiological examination was given, the results were compared with control groups receiving exclusively DXA or QCT for diagnosis or follow-up. Results: Overall, BMD measurements of 404 subjects were analyzed. DXA detected 15 (13.2%) patients having pathologic fractures (n = 114) with normal bone density, 66 (57.9%) with osteopenia, and 33 (28.9%) with osteoporosis. QCT categorized no patients having pathologic fractures with healthy bone density, 14 (12.3%) with osteopenia, and 100 (87.7%) with osteoporosis. T-score DXA, trabecular BMD QCT, and cortical BMD QCT correlated weakly. Trabecular BMD QCT and cortical BMD QCT classified osteoporosis with decreased bone mineral density (AUC 0.680; 95% CI 0.618–0.743 and AUC 0.617; 95% CI 0.553–0.682, respectively). T-score DXA could not predict prevalent pathologic fractures. In control groups, each consisting of 50 patients, DXA and QCT were significant classifiers to predict prevalent pathologic fractures. Conclusion: Our results support that volumetric measurements by QCT in preselected subjects represent a more sensitive method for the diagnosis of osteoporosis and prediction of fractures compared to DXA. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Databáze: Complementary Index
Externí odkaz: