Comparison of models for estimating bark thickness of Picea abies in southwest Germany: the role of tree, stand, and environmental factors.

Autor: Stängle, Stefan M., Sauter, Udo H., Dormann, Carsten F.
Zdroj: Annals of Forest Science (BioMed Central); Mar2017, Vol. 74 Issue 1, p1-10, 10p, 4 Charts, 3 Graphs, 1 Map
Abstrakt: Key message Bark thickness was shown to vary between regions, stands, and trees. Bark thickness prediction equations of different model complexity can be suggested depending on the purpose of application. Site and stand conditions, which influence variation of growth rate to a large extent, seem to have a strong influence on bark thickness, with better site quality leading to smaller relative bark thickness. Context For many applications in forestry and forest science, local or regional species-specific bark thickness equations are used to estimate inside-bark diameters with outsidebark diameter measurements. Aims The objectives of this study were (1) to assess variation in bark thickness due to tree and stand factors in two Norway spruce (Picea abies(L.) Karst) datasets from different time periods, (2) to compare and evaluate alternative established model forms for estimating bark thickness, and (3) to assess spatial variation in bark thickness to estimate the effects of environmental factors on bark thickness. Methods Different bark thickness models were chosen from the literature and compared for their predictive quality for new measurements and a dataset from the 1970s. Mixed-effect modelling was applied to account for the hierarchical data structure, and generalized additive mixed models were used to analyse spatial effects and the influence of climatic factors, such as precipitation and temperature. Results A strong positional autocorrelation of bark thickness within trees and within plots could be shown. Bark thickness was smaller in the new data compared to the measurements from the 1970s. The variation between stands could not be explained by the tested environmental factors, but tree age had a strong positive effect on bark thickness. Conclusion In the study region, the variation of site productivity and individual growth rate seem to have a strong influence on bark thickness, whereas no significant effect of large scale climatic factors could be found. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Databáze: Complementary Index