| Autor: |
Wang, Yangbin, He, Xiaoyu, Chen, Shupeng, Weng, Yiyong, Liu, Zhihua, Pan, Qunlong, Zhang, Rongmou, Li, Yizhong, Wang, Hanshi, Lin, Shu, Yu, Haiming |
| Předmět: |
|
| Zdroj: |
Global Spine Journal; Jan2024, Vol. 14 Issue 1, p306-321, 16p |
| Abstrakt: |
Study Design: Meta-analysis. Objectives: This study aimed to summarize the clinical efficacy and safety of the various annular defect repair methods that have emerged in recent years. Methods: A meta-analysis of randomized and non-randomized controlled trials was conducted. Articles from PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library (CENTRAL) on Lumbar disc herniation treatment with annular repair published from inception to April 2, 2022 were included. We summarized the clinical efficacy and safety of annular repair techniques based on a random-effects model meta-analysis. Results: 7 randomized controlled studies and 8 observational studies with a total of 2161 participants met the inclusion criteria. The pooled data analysis showed that adding the annular repair technique reduced postoperative recurrence rate, reoperation rate, and loss of intervertebral height compared with lumbar discectomy alone. Subgroup analysis based on different annular repair techniques showed that the Barricaid Annular Closure Device (ACD) was effective in preventing re-protrusion and reducing reoperation rates, while there was no significant difference between the other subgroups. The annulus fibrosus suture (AFS) did not improve the postoperative Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). No statistically significant difference was observed in the incidence of adverse events between the annular repair and control groups. Conclusions: Lumbar discectomy combined with ACD can effectively reduce postoperative recurrence and reoperation rates in patients with LDH. AFS alone was less effective in reducing recurrence and reoperation rates and did not improve postoperative pain and function. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
| Databáze: |
Complementary Index |
| Externí odkaz: |
|
