| Autor: |
Beyabanaki, Elaheh, Ashtiani, Reza Eftekhar, Moradi, Mehrnoosh, Namdari, Mahshid, Mostafavi, Delaram, Zandinejad, Amirali |
| Předmět: |
|
| Zdroj: |
Journal of Prosthodontics; Oct2023, Vol. 32 Issue 8, p721-727, 7p |
| Abstrakt: |
Purpose: The purpose of this in vitro study was to compare the flexural strength and Weibull characteristics of 3 different resin‐ceramic materials with a zirconia‐reinforced lithium silicate material after thermal‐cycling. Material and methods: Four different computer‐aided design and computer‐aided manufacturing restorative materials (Vita Enamic, Lava Ultimate, Crystal Ultra, and Vita Suprinity) were tested. A total of 40 Ø12×1.2‐mm disks were prepared and divided into 4 groups (n = 10). Their flexural strength was evaluated after 5000 thermal‐cycles with a 4‐point biaxial flexure test using a universal testing machine. The Weibull modulus and probability of failure were also determined from the biaxial flexural strength data. Data were analyzed with one‐way ANOVA and the Tukey pairwise comparison test (α = 0.05). Results: Significant differences were found among the materials in terms of biaxial flexural strength (p < 0.05). Vita Suprinity had the highest mean ±standard deviation flexural strength (289.1 ± 15.1 MPa), and Vita Enamic had the lowest (100.0 ± 3.2 MPa). The highest Weibull modulus was calculated for Crystal Ultra, followed by Vita Enamic, Lava Ultimate, and Vita Suprinity. Conclusion: Vita Suprinity had the highest flexural strength when compared with the other materials tested. Crystal Ultra had the highest flexural strength among the resin‐ceramic materials. The highest Weibull modulus was calculated for Crystal Ultra and the lowest for Vita Suprinity. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
| Databáze: |
Complementary Index |
| Externí odkaz: |
|
Plný text