| Autor: |
Wu, Kui, Sharifzadeh, Mostafa, Shao, Zhushan, Zheng, Xiaomeng, Zhao, Nannan, Yang, Yuezong |
| Předmět: |
|
| Zdroj: |
International Journal of Geomechanics; Nov2023, Vol. 23 Issue 11, p1-14, 14p |
| Abstrakt: |
The mechanical responses of tunnels with stiff and yielding linings were predicted using an analytical method. A theoretical model of a stiff lining-supported tunnel was established, which considered the effects of tunnel face advancement and lining installation delay. The deformation process in the yielding lining can be divided into three stages based on the elastic–plastic–stiff deformation characteristics of the yielding elements. The circumferential shortening of the yielding lining during Stage 1 was caused by the elastic deformations in the segmental linings and yielding elements. The theoretical stiffness of the yielding lining at this stage was determined, and analytical solutions were derived from the theoretical stiffness in the mechanical model of the stiff lining. The yielding lining deformation during Stage 2 was induced by plastic compression of the yielding elements, and the lining resistance pressure remained unchanged. The yielding lining was reduced to a stiff lining during Stage 3, and analytical solutions for the tunnel displacement and lining resistance pressure during Stages 2 and 3 were provided. The analytical solutions for a stiff lining-supported tunnel were compared with those provided in previous studies, and an analytical model of a tunnel that used a yielding lining was applied to an actual tunnel. The effectiveness and reliability of the solutions were verified by comparing them with the application results. Theoretical analysis showed that tunnel deformation could be controlled using a stiff lining, because the increasing rate of pressure is considerably less than that of the lining bearing capacity. However, a 1.4 m lining thickness was required to prevent lining damage. The yielding lining resistance pressure decreased from 3.46 to 0.68 MPa when the lining was 0.2 m thick, and the yielding displacement increased from 50 to 150 mm. The maximum stress in the lining decreased by 56.95 MPa when the yielding lining was displaced by 50 mm, and the thickness increased from 0.2 to 0.5 m. The application of a stiff lining could be considered for rocks that exhibit weak or average deformability; however, attention should be paid to the yielding lining in rocks that exhibit strong rheology. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
| Databáze: |
Complementary Index |
| Externí odkaz: |
|
