| Autor: |
de Moraes Cruz, Victor, Duarte, Marco Antônio Húngaro, Kato, Augusto Shoji, Alcalde, Murilo Priori, Coelho, Letycia Accioly Simões, Tanomaru‐Filho, Mario, Gavini, Giulio, Vivan, Rodrigo Ricci |
| Předmět: |
|
| Zdroj: |
Australian Endodontic Journal; Sep2023 Supplement 1, Vol. 49, p315-322, 8p |
| Abstrakt: |
This study evaluated, through micro‐computed tomography (micro‐CT), the volume of irrigant diffusion by different techniques of final agitation. Sixty mesiobuccal canals were scanned in a micro‐CT and standardised according to the volume. They were instrumented with the MTwo 40/04 system and using the Terebrix 35 contrast solution as irrigant, were divided into six groups (n = 10): Conventional irrigation with syringe and needle (CI), EndoActivator (EA), EasyClean (EC), RinsEndo (RE), Utrasonic agitation (UI) and XP‐Clean (XP). A second micro‐CT scan was performed and the total irrigant volume and in the final 3 mm apical were determined. The data were analysed using the Anova, Kruskal–Wallis and Dunn tests (p < 0.05). UI and XP showed a higher percentage of total diffusion than CI, EA and RS groups (p < 0.05). In apical diffusion, there was no significant difference between groups (p > 0.05). The final agitation system increases the diffusion of irrigating agents inside the root canal. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
| Databáze: |
Complementary Index |
| Externí odkaz: |
|
Plný text