| Autor: |
Gaeta, Carlo, Marruganti, Crystal, Mignosa, Emanuele, Malvicini, Giulia, Verniani, Giulia, Tonini, Riccardo, Grandini, Simone |
| Předmět: |
|
| Zdroj: |
Australian Endodontic Journal; Sep2023 Supplement 1, Vol. 49, p187-193, 7p |
| Abstrakt: |
The aim of the present study was to compare the physico‐chemical properties of EssenSeal with AH PLUS bioceramic and Pulp Canal Sealer EWT. Flow, solubility, film thickness, radiopacity and setting time were evaluated according to ISO 6876 (2012) specifications. External and cross‐section surface characteristics were analysed under a scanning electron microscope. Statistical analysis was performed using Shapiro–Wilk's test, one‐way ANOVA and the Tukey HSD test. All the sealers conformed to the ISO 6876 (2012) standards, except for the setting time for AH plus bioceramic, which exceeded more than 10% of the time indicated by the manufacturer. Statistically significant differences were found between the three study sealers regarding the physico‐chemical properties tested (p < 0.05). EssenSeal demonstrated characteristics respecting the ISO 6876 (2012) standards and can be considered a predictable alternative in root canal sealing. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
| Databáze: |
Complementary Index |
| Externí odkaz: |
|
Plný text