| Autor: |
Gerrity, Jillian J., Berger, Jonathan H., Hsi, Ryan S., Friedlander, David F., Stern, Karen L., Chew, Ben H., Nimmagadda, Naren, Kavoussi, Nicholas L., Chen, Tony T., Krambeck, Amy E., Large, Tim, Bechis, Seth K., Monga, Manoj, Miller, Nicole L., Lange, Dirk, Knudsen, Bodo, Sourial, Michael W., Humphreys, Mitchell R., Shah, Ojas, Abbott, Joel E. |
| Předmět: |
|
| Zdroj: |
Journal of Endourology; Aug2023, Vol. 37 Issue 8, p863-867, 5p |
| Abstrakt: |
Introduction: Recent retrospective literature suggests that the quick sequential organ failure assessment (qSOFA) scoring tool is a potentially superior tool over use of the systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) criteria to predict septic shock after percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) surgery. Here we examine use of qSOFA and SIRS to predict septic shock within data series collected prospectively on PCNL patients as part of a greater study of infectious complications. Materials and Methods: We performed a secondary analysis of two prospective multicenter studies including PCNL patients across nine institutions. Clinical signs informing SIRS and qSOFA scores were collected no later than postoperative day 1. The primary outcome was sensitivity and specificity of SIRS and qSOFA (high-risk score of greater-or-equal to two points) in predicting admission to the intensive care unit (ICU) for vasopressor support. Results: A total of 218 cases at 9 institutions were analyzed. One patient required vasopressor support in the ICU. The sensitivity/specificity was 100%/72.4% (McNemar's test p < 0.001) for SIRS and was 100%/90.8% (McNemar's test p < 0.001) for qSOFA. Conclusion: Although positive predictive value for both qSOFA and SIRS in prediction of post-PCNL septic shock is low, prospectively collected data demonstrate use of qSOFA may offer greater specificity than SIRS criteria when predicting post-PCNL septic shock. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
| Databáze: |
Complementary Index |
| Externí odkaz: |
|
