| Autor: |
McCarthy, Paul L., Spiesel, Sydney Z., Stashwick, Carole A., Ablow, Ronald C., Masters, Stuart J., Dolan, Jr., Thomas F. |
| Předmět: |
|
| Zdroj: |
Clinical Pediatrics; Nov1981, Vol. 20 Issue 11, p686-691, 6p |
| Abstrakt: |
The chest roentgenograms of 128 consecutive ambulatory children with radiologic pneumonia were read independently and without clinical information by a faculty general pediatrician (Ped), a pediatric radiologist (R-P) and a general radiologist (R-G). The films were classified as normal, indicative of a viral or bacterial process, or indeterminate. Readings were compared with re- sults of viral titers and bacterial cultures. Agreement between any two observers in classifying films, measured by unweighted Kappa, while statistically significant (p < 0.001) for any pair, was low.There was no significant difference between the agreement scores of Ped/R-P, Ped/R-G, and R-P/R-G. Twenty-one patients had fourfold viral titer increases (N = 16) or positive bacterial cultures of blood or pulmonary aspirate (N = 5). The sensitivity of viral readings for titer increases varied from 19% to 68% depending on observer type; the sensitivity of bacterial readings for positive bacterial cultures varied from 60% to 80%. The three observers agreed on a correct reading in only three children with viral and three with bacterial pneumonia. Because of poor observer agreement and appreciable false-negative errors when viral and bacterial readings were compared to titer increases and positive bacterial cultures, respectively, we conclude that radiographic findings are poor indicators of etiologic diagnosis in ambulatory childhood pneumonias and, of themselves, are an insufficient data base for making therapeutic decisions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
| Databáze: |
Complementary Index |
| Externí odkaz: |
|
