| Abstrakt: |
Rather, we are interested in movement itself and how any movement, whether in a sport, fitness, dance or educational setting, does things that come with reciprocal effects across the entirety of its respective movement landscape. This has led to the rise of competing perspectives concerning talent identification and ability in sport and dance as well as debates over what constitutes a functional or useless movement pattern in fitness or exercise settings. For example, in their review of the socio-cultural-history of the moving body Kerr and Espiner ([5]) expounded on the "normative structures that influence sport and movement ... [whereby] ... the techniques, styles and types of sporting movements are rarely stable" (p. 170). In addition, they pointed to the ways in which any movement practice, whether it be in sport, dance or fitness, needs to be analyzed as part of a larger system that includes rules and organizational bureaucracy that come together to "value, celebrate and reward particular types of movements" (p. 171). [Extracted from the article] |
