The clinical utility of rapid exome sequencing in a consanguineous population.

Autor: Monies, Dorota, Goljan, Ewa, Rapid Exome Consortium, Binmanee, Abdulaziz Mohammed, Alashwal, Abdullah Ali Zafir, Alsonbul, Abdullah Mohammed, Alhussaini, Abdulrahman A., Abdallah, Alahmari Ali, Albenmousa, Ali Hussain, Almehaidib, Ali Ibrahim, Hassan, Ali Syed Akhtarul, Alharbi, Amal Salman Alseraihy, Alhabib, Amro, Podda, Antonello, Alsaleem, Badr, Al Saud, Bandar Bin Khalid, Bin Abbas, Bassam Saleh, Faqeih, Eissa Ali, Aljofan, Fahad Badei, Alhazzani, Fahad Naser
Předmět:
Zdroj: Genome Medicine; 6/21/2023, Vol. 15 Issue 1, p1-14, 14p
Abstrakt: Background: The clinical utility of exome sequencing is now well documented. Rapid exome sequencing (RES) is more resource-intensive than regular exome sequencing and is typically employed in specialized clinical settings wherein urgent molecular diagnosis is thought to influence acute management. Studies on the clinical utility of RES have been largely limited to outbred populations. Methods: Here, we describe our experience with rapid exome sequencing (RES) in a highly consanguineous population. Clinical settings included intensive care units, prenatal cases approaching the legal cutoff for termination, and urgent transplant decisions. Results: A positive molecular finding (a pathogenic or likely pathogenic variant that explains the phenotype) was observed in 80 of 189 cases (42%), while 15 (8%) and 94 (50%) received ambiguous (variant of uncertain significance (VUS)) and negative results, respectively. The consanguineous nature of the study population gave us an opportunity to observe highly unusual and severe phenotypic expressions of previously reported genes. Clinical utility was observed in nearly all (79/80) cases with positive molecular findings and included management decisions, prognostication, and reproductive counseling. Reproductive counseling is a particularly important utility in this population where the overwhelming majority (86%) of identified variants are autosomal recessive, which are more actionable in this regard than the de novo variants typically reported by RES elsewhere. Indeed, our cost-effectiveness analysis shows compelling cost savings in the study population. Conclusions: This work expands the diversity of environments in which RES has a demonstrable clinical utility. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Databáze: Complementary Index
Externí odkaz:
Nepřihlášeným uživatelům se plný text nezobrazuje