Topographical anatomy of the left ventricular summit: implications for invasive procedures.

Autor: Kuniewicz, M., Krupiński, M., Urbańczyk-Zawadzka, M., Hołda, M. K., DeFonseka, R., Wadhwa, T., Cholewa, N., Matuszyk, A., Walocha, J., Dobrzynski, H., Kuniewicz, Marcin, Krupiński, Maciej, Urbańczyk-Zawadzka, Małgorzata, Hołda, Mateusz K, Defonseka, Ravin, Wadhwa, Tanvi, Cholewa, Nicole, Matuszyk, Aleksandra, Walocha, Jerzy, Dobrzynski, Halina
Zdroj: Folia Morphologica; 2023, Vol. 82 Issue 2, p291-299, 9p
Abstrakt: Background: Recent clinical reports have emphasized the clinical significance of the left ventricular summit (LVS), a specific triangular epicardial area, as the source of ventricular arrhythmias where radiofrequency ablation is of great difficulty.Materials and Methods: The macroscopic morphology of the LVS has been assessed in 80 autopsied and 48 angio-CT human hearts. According to Yamada's equation, the size was calculated based on the distance to the first, most prominent septal perforator.Results: The size of the LVS varies from 33.69 to 792.2 mm², is highly variable, and does not correlate with BMI, sex, or age in general. The mean size of the LVS was 287.38 ± 144.95mm² in autopsied and angio-CT (p=0.44). LVS is mostly disproportionately bisected by cardiac coronary veins to superior - inaccessible and inferior-accessible areas. The superior aspect dominates over the inferior in both groups (p=0.04). The relation between superior and inferior groups determines three possible arrangements: the most common type is superior domination (50.2%), then inferior domination (26.6%), and finally, equal distribution (17.2%). In 10.9 %, the inferior aspect is absent. Only 16.4% of the LVS were empty, without additional trespassing coronary arteries.Conclusions: The difference in size and content of the LVS is significant, with no correlation to any variable. The size depends on the anatomy of the most prominent septal perforator artery. The superior, inaccessible aspect dominates, and the LVS is seldom free from additional coronary vessels, thus making this region hazardous for electrophysiological procedures. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Databáze: Complementary Index