| Abstrakt: |
Cancer is characterized as a heterogeneous disease of various types. The early detection and prognosis of a cancer type have turned into a major requirement, as it facilitates successive medical treatment of patients. The research team has classified the cancer patients into high or low-risk groups. This makes it a significant task for the medical teams to study the application of deep learning and machine learning models. As a result, such techniques have been employed for modeling the development and treatment of cancer conditions. Additionally, the machine learning tools can have the ability the significant detection features from complex datasets. Numerous techniques like Support Vector Machines (SVM), Bayesian Networks (BN), Decision Trees (DT), Artificial Neural Networks (ANN), Recurrent Neural Network (RNN), and Deep Neural Network (DNN) has been broadly utilized in cancer research. As per the current survey, the detection rate is about 99.89%, which shows the prediction models' efficiency and precise decision making. However, it is proven that deep learning and machine learning approaches can enhance cancer progression. An adequate level of estimation is required for such approaches for considering the daily medical practice. This survey analyzes and learns the diverse contributions of cancer prediction models using intelligent approaches. Further, the paper tries to categorize the different algorithms, the utilized datasets, and utilized environments. Along with this, various performance measures evaluated in each contribution is sorted out. An extensive search is conducted relevant to machine learning and deep learning methods in cancer susceptibility, recurrence, and survivability prediction, and the existing challenges in this area are clearly described. However, ML models are still in the testing as well as the experimentation phase for cancer prognoses. As the datasets are getting larger with higher quality, researchers are building increasingly accurate models. Moreover, ML models have a long way to go, and most of the models still lack sufficient data and suffer from bias. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
Full text from SpringerLink