| Abstrakt: |
The stagnation of the construction of Blimbing Market causes losses suffered by various parties, including the government, developers and traders. This study discusses the dynamics of Blimbing Market development conflicts. This study aims to analyze the dynamics of conflict development of Malang City Blimbing Market. The study found that the stagnation of Blimbing Market development occurred due to differences in views between the parties to the conflict. This research uses a qualitative approach and data collection with literature review techniques. This study will attempt to map the development conflicts of Blimbing Market based on Kenneth E. Boulding's thinking consisting of conflict history, conflict context, conflict parties, issues, dynamics, and alternative routes to solution. Based on this study that the stagnation of Blimbing Market development occurs due to differences in views between the parties to the conflict, namely; First, between the Government of Malang and Karya Indah Sukses Ltd., second, the difference in views between Blimbing Market traders, third, differences in views between traders, fourth, differences in views between the Malang City Government and Karya Indah Sukses Ltd. as an investor. This study refutes Lewis Coser's argument that conflict can not always strengthen internal relationships within a group, but that conflict can actually divide groups that were initially solid to be not solid. This happens to Blimbing Market traders when responding to the revitalization of Bimbing Market, traders are split into two, namely traders who are traders who do not want to move from Blimbing Market and traders who are willing to move to the shelter market. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
