Safety of an Alternative Care Protocol for EMS Non-Transport in the COVID-19 Pandemic.
| Autor: | Glober, Nancy, Hamilton, Jacob, Montelauro, Nicholas, Ulintz, Alex, Arkins, Thomas, Supples, Michael, Liao, Mark, O'Donnell, Daniel, Faris, Greg |
|---|---|
| Předmět: |
COVID-19
PROFESSIONS ASTHMA HOME care services PATIENT selection VITAL signs RETROSPECTIVE studies EMERGENCY medical technicians PATIENTS PEDIATRICS RACE SCHIZOAFFECTIVE disorders MEDICAL protocols COMPARATIVE studies SEPSIS MEDICAL errors EMERGENCY medical services LEGAL compliance DESCRIPTIVE statistics HOSPITAL care CHEST pain QUALITY assurance CHI-squared test INFLUENZA MEDICAL history taking ESSENTIAL hypertension DEATH DATA analysis software METROPOLITAN areas HYPERKALEMIA COVID-19 pandemic PATIENT safety LONGITUDINAL method |
| Zdroj: | Prehospital Emergency Care; May/Jun2023, Vol. 27 Issue 3, p315-320, 6p |
| Abstrakt: | Our primary goal was to evaluate safety of a new emergency medical services (EMS) protocol directing non-transport of low-acuity patients during the COVID-19 pandemic. We performed a retrospective cohort analysis of all patients in Marion County, Indiana, from March 23, 2020 to May 25, 2020 for whom a novel non-transport protocol was used by EMS for patients with low-acuity COVID-19 symptoms. We assessed paramedic compliance with the protocol to determine numbers and types of deviations. We further reviewed a statewide health information exchange database to identify any patients with emergency department (ED) visits, hospital admissions, or death within 30 days of the EMS non-transport. For ED and hospital visits, we collected ED or admission diagnoses to determine if the etiologies were COVID-related. Between March 24, 2020 and May 25, 2020, 222 patients were documented as "Treated, Released (per protocol)." The protocol was correctly applied 144 times (64.8%). The other 78 times, although the EMS clinicians documented use of the protocol, it was not actually used (e.g., another protocol such as "no medical emergency" was used). Of the 144 patients for whom the protocol was used, in 55 cases (38.2%), the clinicians documented patient factors that should have contraindicated use of the protocol (e.g., chest pain, past medical history of asthma). The protocol was applied 5 times (3.5%) in pediatric patients. Two patients were admitted to the hospital within 72 hours of incorrect application of the protocol; both were for COVID-related complaints. Two patients were admitted to the hospital within 72 hours of correct protocol use; one was for a COVID-related complaint. In this case series, paramedics demonstrated large deviations from the novel non-transport protocol. Several patients were admitted to the hospital within 72 hours of non-transport both when the protocol was used correctly, and when it was used incorrectly. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
| Databáze: | Complementary Index |
| Externí odkaz: |
|