| Abstrakt: |
Introduction: According to the EAU guidelines, botulinum toxin type A (BoNT-A) detrusor injections are one of the last options in the management of overactive bladder before opting for invasive surgery. So far, there have been no studies dedicated exclusively to such patients who have undergone this treatment and in whom this treatment has presumably failed. From the patient's point of view, there are questions regarding what reasons led to discontinuation, how patients perceive their BoNT-A treatment in hindsight, what further treatment do these patients receive, and how satisfied such patients are with their current situation. Methods: A database of clinical and inpatient records was searched, and 695 records from 406 patients were identified in a 6-year period, who had received BoNT-A detrusor injections. There were 255 cases that were treated with BoNT-A injections into the detrusor muscle where the therapy was not repeated for at least 12 months (= suspected treatment failures). Interviews with these patients were conducted by mail and phone, and 115 questionnaires could be included in the analysis. Results: From the subjective and prospective points of view of the patients, the most common reason for stopping the therapy was a lack of efficacy of BoNT-A injections (39.1%). For 26.1% of all patients, side effects were a reason for dissatisfaction but never a reason for discontinuation. For 10.4%, the reason for stopping the therapy was spontaneous improvement. 35.6% of the respondents had no follow-up therapy. Those with a follow-up therapy mostly returned to anticholinergic treatment (33%). Operations were carried out on 13%, of which about half were highly invasive. For 71.3% of those patients, who were under any current therapy, this therapy led to no improvement or only some improvement of the symptoms. Surprisingly, 50.4% of the respondents would choose to undergo BoNT-A injection therapy again. Discussion/Conclusion: The majority of patients who did not continue BoNT-A therapy are still suffering from lower urinary tract symptoms. The lack of efficacy was the reason for stopping the BoNT-A injection therapy for less than half of the patients. From the patient's point of view, reasons other than the effectiveness also seem to be relevant in the choice of the treatment. When changing therapy, most returned to drug treatment. However, for the majority of patients with any follow-up therapy, this therapy could not improve the symptoms. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
