| Autor: |
Samples, Derek C., Bartanusz, Viktor |
| Předmět: |
|
| Zdroj: |
Child's Nervous System; Feb2023, Vol. 39 Issue 2, p329-329, 1p |
| Abstrakt: |
Otherwise, as we mentioned already, we very much appreciate Dr. Hakan's philosophical contribution and his warning against terminological ambiguity and the overinterpretation of data in our neurosurgical practice. Although Popper's falsificationism has been questioned as to its usefulness in distinguishing science from pseudoscience, the important point is that according to Popper, the value of a scientific hypothesis or theory is in the fact that it I can be falsified i [[2], [5]]. Dear Editor: We read with great interest the Editorial Cover on the philosophy of science, and we enthusiastically endorse Dr. Hakan's call for scientific rigor; however, we need to point out that Dr. Hakan's interpretation of Karl Popper's falsificationism is incorrect. [Extracted from the article] |
| Databáze: |
Complementary Index |
| Externí odkaz: |
|
Full text from SpringerLink