Autor: |
Slooter, C. D., Perquin, C. W., Zwaans, W. A., Roumen, R. M., Scheltinga, M. R., Slooter, G. D. |
Předmět: |
|
Zdroj: |
Hernia; Feb2023, Vol. 27 Issue 1, p77-84, 8p |
Abstrakt: |
Purpose: Chronic postoperative inguinal pain (CPIP) after pre-peritoneal hernia repair is rare but may be severely invalidating. Mesh may be a contributing factor to the development of CPIP. International guidelines acknowledge mesh removal as a treatment option for CPIP after open repair, but experience in laparoscopic mesh removal is limited. Surgeons are hesitant to remove pre-peritoneal meshes because of fear of operative complications. This observational study describes risks and effectiveness of laparoscopic mesh removal in patients with CPIP after endoscopic inguinal hernia repair. Methods: Questionnaires and operative findings of consecutive patients undergoing a laparoscopic mesh removal for CPIP between August 2014 and February 2019 in the center for groin pain were prospectively recorded. Long-term efficacy was determined using pre and postoperative questionnaires on pain and quality of life. Results: Forty-four patients were included (37 males, median age 51 years). Complete or sufficient pain relief was reported in every two out of three patients (68%) and quality of life improved significantly. Intraoperative findings included wrinkled mesh (n = 19), meshoma (n = 14) and infected mesh (n = 1). Surprisingly, over half of the meshes (n = 23) did not fully cover the groin, with three clear recurrent hernias. Intraoperative complications included two bladder injuries. One patient undergoing removal of 3 meshes on one side developed a necrotic testicle. During follow-up, three patients developed a recurrent hernia requiring open surgery. Conclusion: Laparoscopic mesh removal is safe and effective in selected patients with CPIP after endoscopic hernia repair. We believe that this technique should be adopted by dedicated hernia surgeons. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
Databáze: |
Complementary Index |
Externí odkaz: |
|