Comparing the effects of ankle integral and conventional physiotherapy on pain, range of motion, balance, disability, and treatment effectiveness in patients with chronic ankle instability: Randomized controlled trial.
| Autor: | Negahban, Hossein, Daghiani, Maryam, Raeesi, Javad, Sayyed Hosseinian, Sayyed Hadi, Mousavian, Alireza, Varasteh Hajipour, Mahla, Sahebalam, Mohamad |
|---|---|
| Předmět: |
PAIN
RANGE of motion of joints ANALYSIS of variance JOINT instability ANKLE joint CHRONIC diseases PHYSICAL therapy POSTURAL balance DISABILITY evaluation VISUAL analog scale MEASUREMENT of angles (Geometry) TREATMENT effectiveness RANDOMIZED controlled trials PRE-tests & post-tests BLIND experiment DESCRIPTIVE statistics CHI-squared test RESEARCH funding DATA analysis software EVALUATION |
| Zdroj: | Clinical Rehabilitation; Mar2023, Vol. 37 Issue 3, p362-372, 11p |
| Abstrakt: | Objective: To compare the effects of ankle integral and conventional physiotherapy on pain, range of motion, balance, disability, and treatment effectiveness in patients with chronic ankle instability (CAI). Design: Two-arm, parallel-group, randomized, double-blind, controlled trial. Participants: 60 patients with unilateral CAI. Intervention: integral physiotherapy (n = 30) or conventional physiotherapy (n = 30). Outcomes: Visual Analog Scale (VAS), dorsiflexion and plantarflexion range of motion, Star Excursion Balance Test (SEBT), Single Leg Hop (SLH) test, Foot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS), Lower Extremity Functional Score (LEFS), global rating of change, were gathered pre and post-intervention. Results: The ANOVA results revealed statistically significant interaction for FAOS, and LEFS outcome measures (P < 0.05) and the mean change results showed there were a favorable clinical difference incline toward the integral group (mean |
| Databáze: | Complementary Index |
| Externí odkaz: |
|