Periodontopathic bacterial adhesion to different restorative materials used to elevate proximal subgingival margins.

Autor: Ismail, Hoda S., Azees, Parveez Ahamed Abdul, Wang, Hanzhou, Ali, Ashraf I., Mehesen, Rabab El, Mahmoud, Salah H., Chen, Xiao‐Dong, Yeh, Chih‐Ko, Garcia‐Godoy, Franklin
Předmět:
Zdroj: European Journal of Oral Sciences; Feb2023, Vol. 131 Issue 1, p1-13, 13p
Abstrakt: This study compared the periodontopathic bacterial adhesion to four restorative materials used for deep margin elevation at 2, 24, and 48‐h after incubation. Discs were produced from four restorative materials: resin modified glass ionomer, glass hybrid, flowable bulk fill resin composite, and bioactive ionic resin. Root dentin was used as control. Specimens were coated with saliva and used to culture a biofilm comprised of three strains of periodontopathic bacteria; Porphyromonas gingivalis, Prevotella intermedia, and Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans. Bacterial adherence was assessed by colony count assay, crystal violet staining, and visualized using confocal laser scanning microscopy. Data were analyzed by two‐way ANOVA followed by Tukey's post hoc tests. The adhesion values for the control specimens were significantly higher than for other materials, while those for the flowable bulk fill were significantly lower than for any other material within all evaluation assays. The 2‐h incubation period showed the lowest adhesion values regardless of the group. The 48‐h adhesion values were higher than the 24‐h results in all groups except the flowable bulk fill. Microscopic imaging partially supported the findings of the measurements. In terms of periodontopathic bacterial adhesion, the tested flowable bulk fill may be preferable for subgingival use over other tested materials. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Databáze: Complementary Index
Externí odkaz: