Validity and reliability of the block method for measuring thoracic hyperkyphosis.
Autor: | Chokphukiao, Pakwipa, Wiyanad, Arpassanan, Suwannarat, Patcharawan, Amatachaya, Sugalya, Mato, Lugkana, Wattanapan, Pattra, Gaogasigam, Chitanongk, Thaweewannakij, Thiwabhorn |
---|---|
Předmět: |
STATISTICS
CHEST X rays HUMAN research subjects SAMPLE size (Statistics) RESEARCH evaluation CONFIDENCE intervals RESEARCH methodology evaluation CROSS-sectional method KYPHOSIS INFORMED consent (Medical law) INTER-observer reliability INTRACLASS correlation DESCRIPTIVE statistics RESEARCH funding STATISTICAL sampling STATISTICAL correlation DATA analysis DATA analysis software THORACIC vertebrae |
Zdroj: | Physiotherapy Theory & Practice; Dec2022, Vol. 38 Issue 13, p3037-3044, 8p, 2 Color Photographs, 1 Black and White Photograph, 1 Diagram, 2 Charts, 1 Graph |
Abstrakt: | This study aimed to investigate the concurrent validity of the block method as compared with the gold standard (Cobb's method). An additional aim was to examine the intra- and inter-rater reliability of expert and novice assessors using the block method. In a cross-sectional study, we enrolled 62 participants with hyperkyphosis aged ≥10 years, with hyperkyphosis defined as one or more blocks. The participants were stratified by age (<60 years and ≥60 years). To determine concurrent validity, and kyphosis was assessed in all the participants using the block method and Cobb's method. Finally, 15 participants were included in a reliability study. To determine intra- and inter-rater reliability, each participant was assessed twice, 7 days apart, by one expert and one novice using the block method. The concurrent validity of the block method and gold standard method showed moderate correlation (r |
Databáze: | Complementary Index |
Externí odkaz: | |
Nepřihlášeným uživatelům se plný text nezobrazuje | K zobrazení výsledku je třeba se přihlásit. |