Reducing tumescent anesthetic injection pain by topical anesthesia pretreatment among patients undergoing endovenous radiofrequency ablation of varicose veins: A double-blind randomized controlled trial.
| Autor: | Zhang, Yuan-Su, Chen, Peng-Jie, Wan, Hai-Lin, Chen, Jin-Hui, Mei, Tong, Wang, Wei-Lin, Lu, Yong-Ming |
|---|---|
| Předmět: |
ANESTHESIA
RADIO frequency therapy CATHETER ablation VISUAL analog scale MANN Whitney U Test HYPODERMIC needles RANDOMIZED controlled trials TREATMENT effectiveness T-test (Statistics) VARICOSE veins DESCRIPTIVE statistics CHI-squared test CUTANEOUS therapeutics STATISTICAL sampling DATA analysis software PAIN management |
| Zdroj: | Phlebology; Aug2022, Vol. 37 Issue 7, p529-534, 6p |
| Abstrakt: | Objectives: Tumescent anesthesia frequently causes the intraoperative and postoperative pain during radiofrequency ablation (RFA) of varicose veins. We have to find a way to reduce pain caused by these injections. This randomized controlled trial investigated the effectiveness of topical anesthesia pretreatment (TAP) on relieving needle puncture pain during administration of tumescent anesthesia among patients undergoing RFA of varicose veins. Methods: Eligible patients treated with RFA were recruited and randomized to either application of TAP with lidocaine-prilocaine cream (EMLA) or water-based cream (placebo). The primary outcome was patient described pain scores on the visual analogue scale (VAS) at different time points during the procedure. Secondary outcomes were technical success rate, complications, satisfaction level, expense, and extra analgesia use. Results: Sixty-two patients were randomized: 32 to EMLA and 30 to placebo. Both groups had comparable baseline demographics, CEAP classification, and Venous Clinical Severity Score (VCSS). Less tumescent anesthetic needle puncture pain was found in the EMLA group (22 ± 7 vs 42 ± 8, p <.01). Pain scores of other time points were equivalent. There was less pain in EMLA pretreated area compared to non-pretreated area in the same patient during needle puncture (22 ± 7 vs 45 ± 7, p <.01), and similar phenomena did not appear in the placebo group. There was no statistical difference in complications, satisfaction level, expense, and technical success between the two groups. And no extra analgesia was used in all patients. Conclusion: We recommend the routine use of TAP to reduce the needle puncture pain during tumescent anesthesia in RFA of lower extremity varicose veins. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
| Databáze: | Complementary Index |
| Externí odkaz: |
|