How Do Academic Otolaryngologists Decide to Implement New Procedures Into Practice?

Autor: Powers, Bethany, Smith, Cara Damico, Arroyo, Natalia, Francis, David O., Fernandes-Taylor, Sara
Zdroj: Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery; Aug2022, Vol. 167 Issue 2, p253-261, 9p
Abstrakt: Objective: To identify barriers and facilitators to adoption of a new surgical procedure via an implementation science framework to characterize associated socioemotional, clinical, and decision-making processes. Study Design: Qualitative study with a semistructured interview approach. Setting: Large tertiary care referral center. Methods: Academic otolaryngologists with at least 2 years of practice were identified and interviewed. Transcripts were thematically coded and separated into steps in the clinical pathway. Synthesis of major themes characterized facilitators and barriers to uptake of a new surgical technique. Results: Of 22 otolaryngologists, 19 were interviewed (85% male). They had a median 18 years of practice (interquartile range, 7.8-26.3), and 65% were subspecialty trained. In the decision to implement a new procedure, improving patient outcomes and addressing unmet clinical needs facilitated adoption, whereas costs and adopting profit-driven technologies without improved outcomes were barriers. In patient consults, establishing trust facilitated implementation of new techniques; barriers included participants' hesitation to communicate about the unknowns of a new procedure. Intraoperatively, little change to existing workflow or improved efficiency facilitated adoption, while a substantial learning curve for the new procedure was a barrier. Achieving favorable outcomes and patient satisfaction sustained implementation of new procedures. Too few referrals or indications for the new procedure hindered implementation. Conclusion: Our study demonstrates that innovation in otolaryngology is often an individual iterative process that providers pursue to improve patients' outcomes. Although models for the oversight of surgical innovation emphasize the need for evidence, obtaining sufficient numbers of providers and patients to generate evidence remains a challenge in specialty surgical practice. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Databáze: Complementary Index
Externí odkaz: