| Autor: |
Wieten, Remi, Bex, Floris, Prakken, Henry, Renooij, Silja |
| Zdroj: |
Argument & Computation; 2022, Vol. 13 Issue 1, p49-91, 43p |
| Abstrakt: |
In this paper, we propose an argumentation formalism that allows for both deductive and abductive argumentation, where 'deduction' is used as an umbrella term for both defeasible and strict 'forward' inference. Our formalism is based on an extended version of our previously proposed information graph (IG) formalism, which provides a precise account of the interplay between deductive and abductive inference and causal and evidential information. In the current version, we consider additional types of information such as abstractions which allow domain experts to be more expressive in stating their knowledge, where we identify and impose constraints on the types of inferences that may be performed with the different types of information. A new notion of attack is defined that captures a crucial aspect of abductive reasoning, namely that of competition between abductively inferred alternative explanations. Our argumentation formalism generates an abstract argumentation framework and thus allows arguments to be formally evaluated. We prove that instantiations of our argumentation formalism satisfy key rationality postulates. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
| Databáze: |
Complementary Index |
| Externí odkaz: |
|
