| Autor: |
Nikač, Ţeljko, Simić, Boban, Aritonović, Nikola |
| Předmět: |
|
| Zdroj: |
International Scientific Conference on Security & Euroatlantic Perspectives of the Balkans Police Science & Police Profession; 2016, p1-10, 10p |
| Abstrakt: |
Generally speaking, the criminal proceeding in the field of the internal affairs manifests itself through the realization of two mutually conflicting requirements which the legislator seeks to balance: respect for human rights and freedoms on the one hand, and effective crime prevention, on the other. It is thus require certain legal limits to analyze and expose the systematic legal mechanisms to protect society against crime through the prism of the functions and roles of law enforcement agencies. Results of activities of the Interior to serve the needs of the criminal proceedings, which are generally set as a preliminary question of how to ensure the effective implementation of operational and investigative activities and to adjective comply with procedural forms necessary to form the factual criminal matters. The problem ultimately comes down to what the legal force of the documentary evidence and testimony of witnesses or potential suspects, collected by law enforcement agencies, especially before the court proceedings. The problem can be solved in two ways, by giving the powers of law enforcement to work together with other law enforcement agencies conducting the investigation as a whole, or that an investigation conducted by the court and to law enforcement authorities only as an exception to allow evidence taken action. That's why we need this work in comparative law investigate and analyze the procedural forms that are used to these organs provide evidence for the successful launch and completion of the criminal proceedings. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
| Databáze: |
Complementary Index |
| Externí odkaz: |
|
