| Abstrakt: |
Introduction: ANCA-associated vasculitis is a disease with high morbidity and mortality which has shown to have different phenotypes in different ethnic and racial groups. This disease has been most frequently studied in Caucasians. We studied a group in Southern California where the Hispanics make up half of the population. We believe there will be different phenotypes between the two. Methods: A retrospective study of 114 patients was conducted at two tertiary care centers between 2003 and 2019. Demographic data, ICU admission, ANCA antibody status, BVAS on presentation, VDI per the last clinic visit, the number of hospitalizations, the number of follow-up years, and treatment were recorded. We calculated odds ratios for the categorical data and ran independent sample T test for the continuous data with alpha equal to 0.05 for statistical significance. Results: Difference was found in antibody status, disease presentation, morbidity, and age at diagnosis. Hispanics had greater number of AAV flares despite BVAS and VDI being comparable. Caucasians had more frequent follow-up. Hispanics had a 4.39 increase in odds of being admitted to the ICU, a 1.33 increased odds of developing acute respiratory failure, and a 67% increased odds of developing hemoptysis or pulmonary alveolar hemorrhage. Further, Hispanics had a 1.22 increase in odds of having ESRD. Conclusions: Clinicians treating Hispanic patients with AAV should have a high index of suspicion for severe disease in this patient population. Further, epidemiologic and disparities research should be conducted to evaluate the discrepancy in outcomes in these groups. Key Points • This is the first study to examine the phenotype and severity of ANCA associated vasculitis in Southern California, a population which is comprised largely of Hispanics. • Hispanics in this population were found to be more likely to be admitted to the ICU, have more flares, reach end-stage renal disease, have severe pulmonary manifestations, and had fewer outpatient follow-up visits than their Caucasian counterparts. • Clinicians should have a high suspicion for more severe disease in Hispanics in this region when compared to Caucasians. • More research is needed to assess the degree social determinants of health contribute to these findings and if progress can be made with decreasing health disparities between these populations in this disease. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
Full text from SpringerLink